Microsoft up to their old tricks again?
And there we were believing that we could trust a vendor like Asus. The line they’ve spun to journalists in Australia about the Linux Asus Eee PC 900 being $50 more than the Windows version because it has more storage is a load of bull. Overseas, both models are the same price!
This spoof originally appeared on the now defunct pwot.com (Pointless Waste of Time) Website in 2000.
The Controversial Interview, from February 21, 2000
Q: First of all, thank you, Mr. Gates, for sitting down with us today.
Gates: No problem, Andy. I think your site is the best thing on the internet right now. By far.
Q: That’s very kind. I’d like to start by asking you to look into your crystal ball, so to speak. Where do you see computing five or ten years from now?
By Andy Patrizio on April 28, 2008 10:14 PM
Nothing else needs to be said.
(thank you, Digg)
Just picked this up from the Gnome-Devel mailing list:
+ ndesk-dbus, ndesk-dbus-glib (external dependency)
- good from a security point of view
- need to be in a mono-specific section of the external dependencies
(because of the special rules about depending on mono)
Hmm, I wonder what "special rules" those would be?
Given Mono's encumbrance on Microsoft's poisonous "Intellectual Monopoly"®, that statement is both intriguing and terrifying.
UMG seems to think that the "promotional use only" label somehow gives it "eternal ownership" over the CD. While this might make sense to a goblin living in Harry Potter's world, it's not the law under the Copyright Act. According to the first sale doctrine, once a copyright owner has parted with ownership of a CD, book, or DVD, whether by sale, gift, or other disposition, they may not control further dispositions of that particular copy (including throwing it away). It's thanks to the first sale doctrine that libraries can lend books, video rental stores can rent DVDs, and you can give a CD to a friend for their birthday. It's also the reason you can throw away any CD that you own.