Copyright Hypocrisy
Fri, 12/05/2017 - 1:27pm — HomerDear Andrew Orlowski,
Spot the difference...
Copyright Infringement: Taking other people's ideas without permission or attribution, then reusing them for your own purposes
Copyright: Taking other people's ideas without permission or attribution, reusing them for your own purposes, then falsely claiming to be the sole creator of the result
Bitcoin: Virtual Fool's Gold
Wed, 03/02/2016 - 8:18pm — HomerThe sales pitch for Bitcoin could be; "money without banks". Not only can you conduct financial transactions without some regulating authority (and by implication do so anonymously), but you can also mint your own money from nothing. It's an economic utopia which liberates us from both corporate and government control, whilst eliminating poverty.
The reality is very different, both in principle and in practice.
The Curious Case of Raspberry Pi Consumerism
Mon, 01/09/2014 - 4:03am — HomerMuch like the Cult of Apple
I find the attitude of many within the Raspberry Pi community to be strange and offensive.
I first discovered this odd phenomenon (odd because it contradicts the ethos of the project's academic foundations) back when it first started, as many within the Raspberry Pi community took an extremely hostile attitude toward academic freedom, apparently in defence of various parties' highly dubious intellectual monopolies (Broadcom and MPEG-LA, for example).
I pointed out the irony and hypocrisy of their attitude at the time, explaining that they were more than happy to leech Free (as in freedom) Software for their own benefit, but then balked at the prospect of freely sharing the results, and in particular this contradicted their stated academic goal of facilitating better computer education in British schools, an environment that rightly demands open access to knowledge.